Featured Articles
The Ground Beneath the Water: Land Access as an Operational Risk Water Utilities Can No Longer Ignore
Urban growth is filling in the buffers around utility corridors. Upstream land conversion is raising treatment costs. Legacy site liabilities are repricing under tighter regulatory timelines. Land-related risk is already inside most water utility budgets — it just hasn't been labeled that way. This post maps the risk categories and the operational protocol response.
Is AI Coming For Your Water?
San Francisco Bay Area utilities enhance stormwater management with advanced radar network
Holy water, blessed water – between mystery and the laboratory lens
Contracts, Forecasts, and the Silence of Warning Signals: What Really Collapsed Arizona's CAP Irrigation Districts
The collapse of Arizona's CAP irrigation districts in the early 1990s was not an inevitable consequence of geography, drought, or bad luck. It was the predictable outcome of decisions made decades earlier — decisions to commit to infrastructure costs that economic analysis had already shown were unaffordable, to suppress warning signals that challenged a politically important project, and to lock district finances into contractual structures with no escape provision when reality diverged from projection. In January 1994, the Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District became the first federally supported irrigation district in U.S. history to file for bankruptcy. A second filing followed in August. Neither event was a surprise to anyone who had read the right documents. This post traces the three institutional failure patterns that made collapse inevitable — and what water utilities managing long-term supply contracts and capital commitments can learn from them today.